Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 1229-6783(Print)
ISSN : 2288-1484(Online)
Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science Vol.14 No.3 pp.109-116
DOI :

정기용선계약에서 갑판적재화물 손해에 대한 책임에 관한 연구 - Socol 3호 판결을 중심으로 -

이 원 정*, 김 태 우**
*덕성여자대학교 국제통상학과, **유한대학 유통물류학과

A Study on the Liability for the loss of deck cargo under a time charter - Focused on the decision in the Socol 3 -

Tae-Yoo Kim**, Won-Jeong Lee*
**Department of Distribution Management, Yuhan University
*Department of International Trade, Duksung Women's University

Abstract

It could be debated that the owners were indemnified from the charterers even in respect of the loss of deck cargo caused by the negligence on the part of the owners' servants by a clause 13(b) of NYPE(1993) form, where NYPE(1993) incorporated the Hague/Visby Rules by a paramount clause and did not contained an on deck statement to state or identify what or how much deck cargo was being carried, however the relevant bills of lading all had such statement. The socol 3 of U.K. is a very helpful decision on (1) an on deck statement in bill of lading was sufficient to exclude application of the Hague/Visby Rules to the carriage of deck cargo, as a result, the clause 13(b) should not be null and void by the clause 3(8) of the Hague/Visby Rules (3) the clause 13(b) could not protect the owners from the loss and/or liability caused by negligence and/or breach of the obligation of seaworthiness on the part of the owners, their servants and agents. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to critically analyze the decision in the socol 3, and provide the decision's practical implications in order to prevent legal disputes as to the on deck carriage between the owners and the charterters.

Reference

1.김인현, "국제해상물건운송계약에 관한 2008년 UN CITRAL조약 (로테르담규칙)의 적용범위와 계약자 유의 원칙", 법학연구 제49권 제2호, 2009, p.30.
2.해상법, 법문사, 2007, pp.214-215.
3.송상현 ․ 김현, 해상법원론, 박영사, 2005, p.290.
4.유병욱, "로테르담규칙에서 운송인의 책임에 관한 연구", 국제상학 제24권 제4호, 2009, p.109.
5.이광희 ․ 이원정, 용선계약실무, 박영사, 2009, p.41.
6.최준선, 보험법․해상법, 삼영사, 2010, p.431.
7.Hill Dickinson, Cargo Conventions, 2009, p.7.
8.Holman Fenwick William, "Onego Shipping & Chartering BV v JSC Arcadia Shipping", Shipping Bulletin, 2010, p.2.
9.Ince & Co, "The Socol 3 - NYPE Charter Incorporated the Hague-Visby Rule and Liability for Loss of Deck Cargo due to Vessel Being Unstable", Shipping E-Brief, 2010, pp.79.
10.John F. Wilson, Carriage of Goods by Sea, Pearson Education Limited, 2001, p.180.
11.Lloyd's List, "Deck Cargo", Shipping & Trade Law", 2010, pp.6-7.
12.Reed Smith, "Whether On Deck Statement in Bill of Lading Sufficient to Exclude Application of Hague Visby Rules", R. S. Bulletin, 2010, pp.23-34.
13.Steamship Mutual, "Deck Cargo-Exception and Limitation of Liability", Sea Venture, Vol.14, 2010, p.6.
14.UK P&I Club, "What Impact will the Rotterdam Rules have on your liability?", Legal Briefing, 2009, pp.3-4.
15.Weightmans, "There goes the Deck Cargo : Who carriers the can?", Marine and Transit, 2010, pp.5-6.
16.William Tetly, Marine Cargo Claim, Lexis Law Publishing, 2008, p.651.