ISSN : 1229-6783(Print)
ISSN : 2288-1484(Online)
ISSN : 2288-1484(Online)
수상함 개발에서 기술성숙도, 난이도 및 중요도 기반의 위험도 평가 방안
On a Risk Assessment Methodology based on the Technology Readiness Levels, Degrees of Difficulty, and Technology Need Values in the Development of Naval Surface Ships
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to propose a method of how to perform risk assessment in the early stage ofdefense research and development for the acquisition of weapon systems. An advanced method for riskassessment and its associated objective functions are developed first based on the concept of systemsengineering. The developed method is then applied to carry out the analysis of alternatives in the trade-offenvironments. As a case study, the multi-purpose training ship is considered, where it is performed using thenotions of technology readiness levels, degrees of difficulty, and technology need values to facilitate designspace visualization and decision maker interaction. It is noted that decision makers can benefit from ourapproach as an improved risk assessment method in the context of multi-criteria decision making.
- 18 김경환(151-158).pdf781.9KB
Reference
1. Judith S. Dahmann and Mike Kely(2009), Systems Engineering during the Material Solution Analysis and Technology Development phase, US DDR&E, pp. 2-6.
2. US Department of Defense, "Risk Management Guidebook for DoD Acquisition", pp. 11-14, 2006.
3. Mierzwicki, T., Brown A. J. (2004), "Risk Metric for Multi-Objective Design of naval ships", Naval Engineering Journal, Vol. 116, No. 2, pp. 55-71.
4. Justin Strock, T., Brown A. J. (2008), "Methods for Naval Ship Concept and Propulsion Technology Exploration in a CGX Case Study", Naval Engineering Journal, pp. 103-104.
5. Virginia Tech.(2008), Ballastic Missile Defense Submarine(SSBMD), Design Report, Virginia Tech., p. 35.
6. US DoD(2009), Technology Readiness Assesment (TRA) deskbook, pp. B3-B4.
7. Institute for Defense Analyses(2007), "How the S&T Community can best for the technology Readiness Assessment(TRA) process do's and don'ts", 2007 Technology Maturity Conference, p. 17.
8. US General Accounting Office(1999), Better Management of Technology Development Can improve weapon system outcomes, pp. 4-5
9. John C. Mankins(2009), "Technology readiness and risk assessments : A new approach", Science Direct, pp. 1210-1212.
10. John C. Mankins(1998). "Research & Development Degree of Difficulty(RD3)" A White Paper, NASA, pp. 1-3.
2. US Department of Defense, "Risk Management Guidebook for DoD Acquisition", pp. 11-14, 2006.
3. Mierzwicki, T., Brown A. J. (2004), "Risk Metric for Multi-Objective Design of naval ships", Naval Engineering Journal, Vol. 116, No. 2, pp. 55-71.
4. Justin Strock, T., Brown A. J. (2008), "Methods for Naval Ship Concept and Propulsion Technology Exploration in a CGX Case Study", Naval Engineering Journal, pp. 103-104.
5. Virginia Tech.(2008), Ballastic Missile Defense Submarine(SSBMD), Design Report, Virginia Tech., p. 35.
6. US DoD(2009), Technology Readiness Assesment (TRA) deskbook, pp. B3-B4.
7. Institute for Defense Analyses(2007), "How the S&T Community can best for the technology Readiness Assessment(TRA) process do's and don'ts", 2007 Technology Maturity Conference, p. 17.
8. US General Accounting Office(1999), Better Management of Technology Development Can improve weapon system outcomes, pp. 4-5
9. John C. Mankins(2009), "Technology readiness and risk assessments : A new approach", Science Direct, pp. 1210-1212.
10. John C. Mankins(1998). "Research & Development Degree of Difficulty(RD3)" A White Paper, NASA, pp. 1-3.
-
-
Online Submission
http://submission.koreasafety.or.kr
-
KSSM
The Korean Society of Safety ManagementWaste Society
-
Editorial Office
Contact Information- Tel: +82.31.336.2844
- Fax: +82.31.336.2845
- E-mail: safety@mju.ac.kr -
-
-
-
-
-
-
